Colocado por: hfviegasmas a Bimby não tem que baixar de preço , a marca que faz a bimby pode perfeitamente criar um produto identico com uma referencia diferente e coloca-lo no mercado com um valor mais real ... aliás acontece com muitas marcas e muitos produtos aonde se ajusta o preço inflacionado á nessecidade do mercado ... ora bem se as vendas da Bimby não cairem não vejo motivo para isso acontecer ...mas se cair qual é o problema ??????
Falso, o aspirador da rainbow, continua com valores proibitivos. Isso e os colchões xpto. Acredito que a bimby não baixe de preço. Mas posso estar enganado.Concordam com este comentário:sergyio
Colocado por: rafaelisidoro
Colocado por: dedaohá tempos passou uma reportagem na Tv a dizer que a Sony vendia a PS3 abaixo (cerca de metade) do preço de produção. Isto para difundir o blu-ray em vez do HD video toshiba. lá triunfou...
E fez o mesmo com o VHS penso.
Quanto ao VHS, a sony é que se lixou, pois o seu BETA era muito melhor que o VHS!! Como se lixou com o DAT e com o Minidisk.
Indeed, the main thing that didn't fit was the idea was that Betamax was "technically superior". Standing in a shop at the time, there was absolutely no visible difference in picture quality, and some reviews had found that VHS's quality was superior.
I "knew" Betamax was superior -- that was the received wisdom, even at the time - and maybe it was, in a lab. But I wasn't buying a lab test rig. In terms of "the whole product", VHS was clearly superior, so that's the way I went. Along with everybody else.
Later I found out that Betamax had owned the market, but lost it because Sony got one simple decision wrong. It chose to make smaller, neater tapes that lasted for an hour, whereas the VHS manufacturers used basically the same technology with a bulkier tape that lasted two hours. Instead of poring over the sound and picture quality, reviewers could simply have taken the systems home. Their spouses/children/grandparents and everybody else would quickly have told them the truth. "We're going out tonight and I want to record a movie. That Betamax tape is useless: it isn't long enough. Get rid of it."
Betamax was the first successful consumer video format, and at one time it had close to 100% of the market. All of the video machines in use and all of the pre-recorded movies were Betamax. It had a de facto monopoly, and an element of lock-in (because of tape incompatibilities). It lost because, at the time, it could not do what consumers wanted: record a whole movie unattended. And although Betamax playing times were extended, they never caught up with VHS.
Other elements of the oft-repeated Betamax story are also wrong. For example, while Sony was certainly slow to bring in other manufacturers, it had tried to license it to rivals such as JVC before VHS was even launched. Betamax was not generally more expensive: Sony had to slash its original high prices but generally it was competitive. Indeed, after it had lost the market, Betamax machines were often cheaper than VHS ones.
And at the beginning, there was no comparative shortage of Betamax movies to rent: actually, they were all Betamax. (Stan Liebowitz, Professor and Associate Dean of the School of Management, University of Texas at Dallas, has done most research on this, but see urbanlegends.com for a quick guide.)
Even if Betamax had been "technically superior", it wouldn't have mattered. VHS users have long had the chance to upgrade to the compatible SuperVHS format with superior picture quality. But rather than demanding better pictures for today's TV sets, consumers have shown more interest in LP (Long Play) modes that reduce the picture quality to provide longer recording times.
VHS won because "the whole product" did what people wanted at a price they were willing to pay. And when people use the VHS v Beta analogy, they are not indicating a market failure but their own ignorance.
Colocado por: system32Errado, isso é um investimento para depois venderem jogos a 70€!
Colocado por: luisvv
Mito. O Betamax era melhor em alguns aspectos, mas falhou como produto: essencialmente, tinha cassetes muito curtas, e não fornecia a mesma flexibilidade que o VHS.
Colocado por: dedaohá tempos passou uma reportagem na Tv a dizer que a Sony vendia a PS3 abaixo (cerca de metade) do preço de produção. Isto para difundir o blu-ray em vez do HD video toshiba. lá triunfou...
E fez o mesmo com o VHS penso.
Colocado por: 1976digo eu, que às vezes me engano (logo nunca poderei ser primeiro ministro ou presidente da república), que quem compra a bimby compra o estatuto de ter uma bimby. que diz algo do género: eu tenho dinheiro que chegue para ter uma 1-2-3 cara como o caraças. e depois aquilo lá vai passando entre as/os aspirantes ao estatuto social, que em dezenas de não-tão-suaves prestações lá acabam com mais um tareco para enfiar dentro dos móveis...
mas, com isso podem dizer com ar altivo, eu tenho uma bimby! "tu não?? como vives sem uma???"Concordam com este comentário:Sabrina
Colocado por: becas
Isto até pode ser verdade em alguns casos, mas está longe de ser um retrato da realidade. Tenho várias amigas/conhecidas com bimby e nem uma se encaixa neste perfil.